12/7/09

Adventus

Reflecting on the current Holiday Season, I was inspired to scribble out this bit of prose. Enjoy:


-Picture the night horizon lit by fire. The distance flares and glows with orange and red and yellow, and all around it is black. This is where we stand, on a low ridge facing the North, where the flames rage and broil. Behind us is a world that we barely understand, but that we cling to with every beat of our hearts and breath of our lungs. Beyond the fire is nothing, and the fire is creeping our way.
-All around the city now it is cold, for we are once more in a familiar place at a familiar time. The sky is a flat gray that looks cold, if ever something could. The city is filled with people who never look up, and filled with a longing for a hope that has come, and waits on them if only they could find it. This time is advent, and Christmas is approaching.

-There is an obsession with light, and we see it all around us in the strands of white and color that hang from trees and houses, filling windows and adorning hearths. The lights are bright, and bring us near them with a beauty that attracts and comforts. Yet the lights are electric, and as cold as the day’s unwelcoming sky.
-We wait, for we know that soon the lights will fail, and the sky will darken, and the fires will begin. We will call it the Apocalypse.

-There is an old man with us, who carries with him words that are scrawled in mud upon ragged bits of cloth. We are in the city, but it is no longer familiar and the time is no longer known. The old man reads to us every night from the words he carries, and we try to remember in our hearts.

-‘There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. Men will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. When these things begin to take place, stand up and life up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.’


-This is the story we tell now at Christmas, and we hold our heads in our hands as we search the skies for our redemption...and all the while long for the electric lights of our past--though we have forgotten that they were cold.

11/20/09

Up in the Air


Greetings fellow humans. Did you take the time to appreciate the fresh, free air this morning? I hope so, because very soon we will all be living underground breathing from recyclers and cursing the very sun that once kept us warm and happy. The robot apocalypse is nigh, so repent ye sinners!

On another note entirely, I recently had the good fortune to be invited to a special screening of Jason Reitman's new film Up in the Air, hosted by the director himself. Reitman, as you will no doubt recall, is the writer/director responsible for the excellent Thank You for Smoking and the game-changing Juno (though he did not write that one...we all know the stripper story by now.) He is considered one of the film world's brightest emerging talents, and having seen him talk in person, I can confirm that he is officially a cool dude (even though he is Canadian.)

The screening began with Reitman introducing the film and answering a few questions, all the while sporting a plaid flannel with a skullcap and looking for all the world like a hipster lumberjack. He told of the seven year struggle to get Up in the Air made, and how over that time the film had matured and evolved in the writing (it is adapted from a novel) as he himself went from being single to a family man. This is an important detail, because at its core, Up in the Air is about human relationships. He also spoke of how, after doing commercials and short films, he had adapted Thank You for Smoking only to be rejected by everybody. Not surprisingly, nobody wanted to make a satire on the American tobacco industry that lampooned both sides of the smoking argument equally (had it been staunchly anti-smoking I'm sure he would have had an easier time.) His break came when, out of the blue, a San Fransisco-based internet millionaire heard about the script and decided to pay for the movie himself. The lesson here, kids? Hard work and determination only pay off if you can find yourself a millionaire.

Reitman then talked about Juno, even throwing around a few jokes about the backlash to the film (which I think is more aimed at Cody's script then Reitman's directorial abilities.) After much ado, including the BBQ restaurant Fat Mat's providing Reitman with an honorary T-Shirt and bottle of sauce since they get a shout out in Up in the Air, the film rolled.

And what a film. To start off with, I firmly believe Up in the Air (to be released around Christmas) will be an Oscar contender, certainly for Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay. It is an all around impressive and emotional film that really only fails on one point: it stars George Clooney. Clooney doesn't play a character (as he seldom does) he simply acts like himself; complete with unconvincing reactions and unbearable smugness. It is a shame, too, because the rest of the cast is phenomenal to include another fantastic turn by Jason Bateman and the welcome appearance at the end of fellow Southerner, Danny McBride. Further, there are some great cameos from Zack Galiafinakis and J. K. Simmons (the dad from Juno, J. Jonah Jameson). One of the other nice casting touches was actually recording interviews with recently fired individual in St. Louis and Detroit, where the film was shot, and using them in the film. Real people telling their real stories.

Up in the Air strikes a very raw chord with its narrative, as it is essentially about a man and a company that are hired to fire people: outsourced "termination engineers" who are very good at what they do. Clooney's character literally lives "up in the air", flying from place to place to fire people for cowardly executives who can't do it themselves. In today's economic climate, a few very interesting points are raised by the film's story about the ethics behind firing employees and just what a company owes its workforce (my answer? Nothing.) Reitman said he began the script seven years ago simply as a comedy complete with absurd firing scenes with people reacting in wild ways, but by the time they started shooting earlier this year he had cut nearly all of the firing scenes out of the story. The ones that remain are poignant and thought-provoking.

However, as I previously stated, the story is about relationships, and like this years 500 Days of Summer, it doesn't seek to present a trite sort of "Hollywood" answer to love and commitment. Up in the Air, therefore, is not really a "feel good" movie. In contrast, it feels like an honest look at life and love in a modern age that has robbed most people of hope and feelings of worth, or personal connection.

Don't read that last paragraph wrong, though. The movie is funny, and at times (despite Clooney) quite charming in the same ways that Reitman's previous films were. The man certainly is a talent, and he has continued with Up in the Air to solidify his place in cinema. Take a look at the trailer at the end of this post and know that the film is excellently written, and very timely.

9/15/09

Word Play

...May break my bones. Well, other peoples, maybe. Mine are made of adamantium.

THIS STORY is the headline over at Drudge currently (as I type) and I must say it is a report of mind-numbing stupidity on the behalf of our wonderful Legislature.

Basically, Politico sums up the madness thusly:

"House Rules Committee Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D-NY) has released a helpful, updated primer for members regarding their conduct on the floor and in committees.

Especially useful: The section on how to properly insult the executive branch in the in the chamber.

"Disgrace" and "nitwits" -- okay.

"Liar" or "sexual misconduct" -- ixnay.

Under section 370 of the House Rules and Manual it has been held that a Member could:

• refer to the government as “something hated, something oppressive.”
• refer to the President as “using legislative or judicial pork.”
• refer to a Presidential message as a “disgrace to the country.”
• refer to unnamed officials as “our half-baked nitwits handling foreign affairs.”

Likewise, it has been held that a member could not:

• call the President a “liar.”
• call the President a “hypocrite.”
• describe the President’s veto of a bill as “cowardly.”
• charge that the President has been “intellectually dishonest.”
• refer to the President as “giving aid and comfort to the enemy.”
• refer to alleged “sexual misconduct on the President’s part.”

h/t Marty Kady, who is neither a nitwit nor a liar."

If I were to be surprised by any of this, I would have to trade in my blogger card and go join the circus...because I'd be a clown. I wonder if it is any significance that the House Rules Committee "Chairwoman" has the last name Slaughter.

I wish I could find some irony in the above, but I just can't.

8/28/09

The Story About the Pants That I Am Wearing


It was while I was having coffee with the Japanese businessmen this morning that I realized just how baffling the last twelve hours had been. By this point my pants were soaked from the knee down due to the torrential downpour that had begun well before dawn, and had yet to cease. My feet were also soaked, and worse, beginning to itch. I thought it best not to mention this fact to my new Japanese friends, who were still engaged in conversation amongst themselves over a question I had just posed:
"Would you consider it racist to yell 'Godzilla' at Japanese people?"
As they dissected the concept with their poised Eastern wits, I reflected on my pants situation and how pants had factored prominently in my adventures up until that point. Pants more or less started the whole mess that had led me to that coffee shop.

The pants in question are a pair of fairly nondescript khakis (you wouldn't be able to pick them out of a line up--unless all the other pants were ethnic) that I purchased on sale at Wal-Mart. They were inexpensive khakis, being on sale, but unfortunately a little too long. Despite this fact, I bought them and promptly began wearing them with reckless disregard for the appearance of my heel to ankle region. Then I met Rebecca, who among other things, possessed the necessary skills to trim my trousers. For a trifling fee (in this case the admission price to a Tarantino film) she claimed she could alter the length of the pants in question to the proper, respectable length via a process mysterious called "hemming", for which Ernest is named.

Thus I relinquished my pants into Rebecca's care and went on about my life in the usual sort of way until I received word via helpful woodland creatures (far more reliable than Verizon) that the pants had been successfully "hemmed" and were ready to once more don my sub-torso. A rendezvous was therefore established at a predetermined time and place, with great care taken in the planning to ensure the security of the exchange. It was decided that a public place was best, during a casual gathering of other friends, family, and close associates who would have no prior knowledge of the "hemming." Team trivia at Rocky Mountain Pizza was the agreed upon rallying point and it was understood that both I and Rebecca would bring along enough non-pants related personnel to make the team trivia scenario convincing.

At this point in my reminiscing, the Japanese businessmen informed me that they must be getting to their "business" and so sadly depart, having failed to conclusively resolve the conundrum which I had posited earlier in the story. I too decided that it was well within my rights as an American citizen to go to my place of employment, sodden as I was and now quite tardy. It was while at my desk some short moments later that I return my mind to the saga of the previous eve.

The pants transaction was a success, but not a flawless one. Rebecca was careless in the hand off and suddenly all of our other "teammates" became aware of the farce in which they were unwitting participants. However, their ire was easily assuaged once Rebecca showed them just how masterfully she had been able to "hem" the khakis. Awe quickly replaced our teammates anger, and soon the pants were out of sight, out of mind and we gave trivia a solid run, coming in fourth but nearly achieving victory by as little as a single point.

Post-trivia, it was clear that though the pants exchange had been a bit compromising, it was a decided success. Rebecca, the notorious agent provocateur Shanerton, and I felt that surely a celebration was in order. To our mild dismay, four of the other players in our maddening charade had call to part (as lovers are want to do from the company of beguilers.) Thus we bid adieu to Brent and Delaina, who I had brought along as part of my cover, and also Mark and his girlfriend (who in a strange twist of coincidence are both Brent's and Delaina's roommates respectively.) The four having departed, Rebecca's intrepid younger brother Robert Lee led us towards his dwelling where, my pants in hand, we would be meeting with more conspirators to whisper sweet seditions long into the night.

In a room filled with mirrors, we met with Rebecca and Robert's sister and the second part to the globe-trotting duo, of which Shane was the other, code named "Shetty", Hetty. The house was determined to be safe enough for the pants to be brought inside, and Hetty was soon leading us in conferencing about the nuances of New Zealander folk musicians along with the renowned comedian and saboteur, O.D., and the supposedly innocent roommate, Ashley. Apparently, prior to our arrival, a dance party had been in the works, but as the proverb states "pants and dancing are a deadly combination", and as the pants to people ratio was currently skewed in the favor of pants, the dancing was put on standby.

Before long, the sounds of a nearby fiesta came wafting to our ears on the night breeze and it was determined that Rebecca, Shane, and I were duty bound by the Awesome Code to infiltrate (or in the modern parlance, "crash") said soirée. Robert, Hetty, and Ashley were not up to the task, presumably due to lack of respect for the code or possibly insufficient training, and O.D. uncertain as to how best he should proceed. We left him to his indecision and walked across the street armed with warm cans of Natty that Ashley had strategically placed in our care in order to more easily subvert the partiers suspiciousness.

It did not take long for the three of us to assess the situation: the party was a Georgia Tech "kegger" populated by clearly underage frat boys and petite Asian girls; a veritable visual stereotype. Our infiltration was achieved quite easily, and before long Shane and Rebecca were engaging the frat boys in their traditional, though nonsensical custom of "beer pong." I however was suddenly aware of my blatantly obvious lack of pants. Almost stricken in a moment by panic, I realized that I had left the package back at the house, carelessly endangering my friends. To my great relief, it was at that very moment that I received a phone call from O.D. asking me (very discreetly) if one of us had left a bag of pants. In hushed tones, I explained the situation to him and he agreed to traffic the pants to the party himself. Once he arrived, all was once again right in the world...if only for a brief time.

Shane and Rebecca would go on to win a round of beer pong as O.D. and I studied the awkwardness of our surroundings. At some point an impromptu dancing lesson took place as Rebecca attempted to instruct me in something known as "swing dancing" and Shane and O.D. took it upon themselves to, and I quote the poet, "boogy."

I barely escaped alive, the last thing I remember hearing being "It's my duty to please that booty." A few short hours later the storm broke and I found myself having coffee with the Japanese business men wearing a pair of pants that had more history to them than any one article of clothing should.

8/10/09

The Funny Thing About Funny People


I was not entirely surprised to learn, after its opening weekend, that Funny People had failed to have the draw that Judd Apatow's earlier efforts had boasted. I thought, perhaps, that the long run-time would have something to do with that, as well as all the hold over summer nonsense films that continue to rake in cash against all reason (i.e. G-Force, Ice Age 3, Harry Potter, etc.) I also recognized that the tone was significantly more somber in Funny People than in Knocked Up or The 40 Year Old Virgin...yet I didn't initially think that this was an issue.

Therefore it came to me as quite a shock when many of my friends began to get around to seeing the film and expressing their utter disdain for it. On more than one occasion I was confronted by a friend who absolutely detested the film. Why was this such as shock? Chiefly because Funny People is one of the most full-on moralistic parables in recent memory. For people (like my friends) who more-or-less uphold traditional moral values in relation to marriage and family, Funny People should have come as a welcome to surprise. It certainly did for myself.

In an even odder twist, an op-ed in the Times picked up on this thread and developed some very astute conclusions about the conservatism of Apatow's films and how Funny People demonstrates where moralism starts to cost people, and how Americans apparently (if judging by the box office as well as my friend's reactions) just don't care for that sort of confrontation.

The entire, fantastic article can be read HERE, but two quotes that really stood out to me are as follows:
"No contemporary figure has done more than Apatow, the 41-year-old auteur of gross-out comedies, to rebrand social conservatism for a younger generation that associates it primarily with priggishness and puritanism. No recent movie has made the case for abortion look as self-evidently awful as “Knocked Up,” Apatow’s 2007 keep-the-baby farce. No movie has made saving — and saving, and saving — your virginity seem as enviable as “The 40-Year Old Virgin,” whose closing segue into connubial bliss played like an infomercial for True Love Waits.

"But “Funny People”
is a Judd Apatow movie — endless penis jokes and all. It’s just a more grown-up one, in which doing the right thing comes harder, and bad choices aren’t easily unwound. The way it’s been received suggests that his fan base isn’t ready to hear this kind of story yet. But it’s also reminder that Americans of all ages tend to like their social conservatism much more in theory than in practice."

What then, I wonder, did my supposedly morally conservative (read Christian) friends find so unappealing about the film? Was the issue, as the Times writer postulates, that they only want to be handed the "sexy", easier to digest values of life, love, and marital bliss? Could it be that when the rubber meets the road (to borrow the colloquialism) too many "social conservatives" are ready to frown and abandon ship?

8/9/09

A Return to Form

Free-Lancing in Dublin town.

Having completed a grand European excursion wherein I acted as Ambassador of Goodwill Towards America in the fine countries of Ireland, the United Kingdom, Spain, and France I returned home and found at once that I was "blogged out." The reason for this blogging exhausted relates directly to the fabulous chronicle of my journey that I kept up at YANKS ACROSS THE POND. If you didn't read along, shame on you. However, there is always time to go back and read bits here and there at your leisure, for the blog will remain up indefinitely and, as is this one, is fully searchable. Try typing random words and phrases into the search and see what comes up. You never know.

Now I return to the Free-Lancer, at long last. In the time since I took my European hiatus I have seen many of the big summer tent-pole pictures that Hollywood has rolled out, and none impressed me more than Public Enemies. I must, as it is long since past due, abstain from writing a full review. I will state this for the record: Public Enemies is the best film to have come out this year and is one of the best period pictures to come out since 2007's The Assassination of Jesse James (of which many of you know that I find to be one of the best movies ever made.)

I saw Funny People and found it reasonably entertaining, but over-long. There is a considerable amount of depth to the picture, and Sandler gives one of the best performances of his career--let alone of any "comedic" actor-turned-serious. I would warn you that if you are going into the film looking for the goofiness of Sandler's standard fare, or the crude humor of Apatow's other work, you will likely come away disappointed. Funny People is a much more mature film making endeavor, and it should be approached as such.

Finally, my full endorsement of any film yet to be released this summer must fall squarely behind Moon, which if you are not familiar with the picture, is a sci-fi drama staring Sam Rockwell and directed by first-timer Duncan Jones AKA David Bowie's son Zowie Bowie. The film is beautifully crafted in both story and cinematography, and marks a return to form for the "serious" science fiction picture (something that was almost achieved two years ago with Sunshine, though that movie unraveled catastrophically in the end.) Rockwell is amazing (as he usually is) and the film is gripping and thought-provoking while also managing to keep a under current of humor, mostly due to Rockwell's incredible on screen charm.
Here is the trailer:


Rolled out in a limited release fashion, I believe Moon has gone wide now and if you hurry, you should still be able to catch it in theatres. Forget the travesty that is G.I. Joe (a heartbreaking affront to the joys of my childhood) and shoot for the Moon.

6/25/09

Globe Trotting

In a matter of days I will be packing up my lance and heading to Europe.

To that effect, posting hear will take a hiatus, but never fear. The entire chronicle of my (and my companions') endeavors shall be available for your reading pleasure at the brand new blog created specifically for the upcoming trip:

YANKS ACROSS THE POND.

I hope to blog a good amount over there, and even get videos up at regular intervals. I sort of dropped the ball on that in Australia last year (at least in regards to the video aspect.) However, I am now a seasoned travel writer, and Europe looks like it has a lot more available internet then Oz did.

Hope you check in.

Cheers.

6/14/09

Epitaph


To be scrawled in flowing script upon a headstone of obsidian:

All the world was a burning mass of unsatisfied yearnings and misplaced hopes,
yet the sun that set on the two of them died as beautifully as their dreams.

6/4/09

The Tain

I saw the The Decemberists live last night for the third time. Later I will tell you of the show, for twas awe-inspiring. However, for now I just want to point you to my favorite of their endeavors: the musical interpretation of the Táin Bó Cúailnge (pronoucned t-oi-n bo cooley), one of the most important works in Irish mythology (interpreted from Irish as "The Cattle Raid of Cooley").

Here, the 18 plus minute song simply entitled "The Tain" is visualized in an awesome paper-style animation that explains the story. Enjoy:

6/3/09

He's Just Not Into Chick Flicks


I don’t think I would be dropping any bombs on anyone in saying that I watch a lot of movies. If you could stream movies from my head you’d probably have a much better selection than what you can view for free at Hulu.com (shameless plug.) That being said, even though I watch an inordinate amount of films, I try to be selective. There are too many classics I haven’t seen for me to justify dropping down in front of something like Saw 2-5 (are they up to six yet?). I figured until I have seen every John Wayne movie, I won’t go near Twilight.

That being said, there are two periods of time every year that, for a few reasons, I engage in what can only be described as cinematic flagellation. The first period is of course “awards season” in the fall and early winter where all the crap meant to pass as the best in cinema that year is carted out in limited spurts to garner almost obligatory acclaim before being relegated a few months later to the five dollar bin at Wal-Mart (The Reader, for example.) I do my duty as a critic of film and culture and see nearly all of the nominated films (or potential nominees) primarily to write brilliantly articulated warnings to anyone and everyone who might mull over the idea of buying a ticket to Revolutionary Road instead of Gran Torino (one of last year's, nay the decade’s, best films).
That is my duty, and I take my charge as The Free-Lancer very seriously.

Now, the second period is a little less honorable. It is the time, usually during the summer, wherein for a host of reasons (boredom, too much freedom in front of a computer at work, curiosity, etc…) I spend a few weeks to a month watching....wait for it….romantic comedies. This is without a doubt one of the most painful times of my year. Sometimes I discover a gem (last year’s Definitely, Maybe was a surprising treat…and Zack Galiafinakis and Rob Cordrey were hilarious in the otherwise abysmal What Happens in Vegas.) Yet more often than not I feel like I have to work to finish these movies, and in the end I have lost just that much more faith in the American movie-going public. If ever there was a reason to be a misogynist, it is the modern chick flick.

Doesn't this guy look like Bradley Cooper?

I say all this because that dreaded period in my year has apparently begun for me again, as I have just finished watching He’s Just Not That Into You

…and I want to blow my brains out.

The movie is over two hours long, has maybe five jokes in it (despite a cast that boasts Justin Long, Bradley Cooper, and E from Entourage.) The length is the first problem, because all the insight this movie has to offer is in its title. The rest of the time is spent showing us the myriad ways in which women are insane, delusional, or just plain retarded. The great cast is wasted on a stupid, one note script, though the girl from Big Love was endearing. Scarlett Johansson just plays a whore like she always does, and Ben Affleck doesn’t get enough screen time. At the end of the movie the pearls of wisdom Hollywood wishes to leave us with are:
1) You can cheat on your wife and still keep you marriage, but you better not smoke cigarettes or you are the scum of the earth.
2) Women are allowed to break up marriages for “true love”, but if that guy goes back to his wife and leaves the adulteress, he is a horrible person.
3) We are meant to believe Justin Long is a stud (you know, the scrawny kid from Dodgeball.)
4) Sometimes your happy ending isn’t a person, it’s moving on…WTF?

Also, Drew Barrymore is in the movie for about a minute, and I have no idea why. Ultimately, the best part of the movie was the Keane song that played over the last few minutes.

Cool Guys Don't Look at Explosions

Nobody cares about the MTV Movies awards. I have no idea why they even take the trouble to put the show on in the first place. However, it would be interesting to see how MTV stacks up against the Oscar's ratings wise.....

Anyway, one good thing to come out of the MTV Awards every year is the spoofs wherein comedians will be inserted into scenes from the previous year's popular films in parody--such as 2009's opening with host Andy Samberg added into Slumdog Millionaire, Twilight, The Reader, etc:



This year however, the original content was taken to a whole new level as nearly a dozen Internet videos were created with Andy Samberg. (UPDATE: sorry, apparently MTV doesn't want you to see there promos anymore, because they've all the embed codes have been deactivated.)

However, probably the best video to come out of the whole thing was the music video homage to "cool guys walking away from explosions" featuring Samberg, Will Ferrell as Neil Diamond, and a very surprising guest: